Thursday, June 12, 2008

Fabricated Science

One of the outlandish lies promulgated by the warmist faithful is that an overwhelming majority of scientists are convinced human activity is driving catastrophic climate change. In typical Stalinist fashion they obviously feel that repeating this lie often enough makes it true. Why aren’t they compelled to share the evidence that informs their “science” with the rest of us?

It will be very surprising if these warmists don’t try to discredit the 32,000 scientists who, so far, have signed the Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine’s new petition truly demonstrating an overwhelming response from the scientific community refuting this fabricated claim of consensus. These scientists, whose numbers are increasing by a daily average of 35 signatures, are individually vetted by credentials and purpose to ensure their authenticity. The real scientific community has finally had enough of the lies and hysterical claims coming out of the politicized cabal of frauds masquerading as climate scientists.

National Post columnist Lawrence Solomon contacted the Secretariat of the UN’s IPCC to see if he could survey the 2500 scientists who purportedly constitute the “overwhelming” consensus of the prevaricating warmists. He was told the list was not public and the scientists could not be individually contacted. The Secretariat said these people were just reviewers who hadn’t personally endorsed the conclusions of the UN’s report. Even though the media incessantly claims these scientists endorsed the report’s summary, the UN never bothered to issue a correction that they really hadn’t. In fact, the chapter in the UN’s AR4 (the most recent climate report) claiming a 90% confidence level of human-caused climate change was written and reviewed by only 51 people! Imagine that – 32,000 and counting against 51. What an amazingly fraudulent joke the warmist’s consensus turns out to be.

The deception doesn’t stop there. Scientists employed by NASA’s GISS and Hadley’s CRU are actively engaged in re-writing the data obtained from observation. James Hansen of NASA regularly “adjusts” the data obtained over the years in a fashion that better conforms to his warmist views. He has adjusted the data at least 7 times since 2000 that makes the years previous to 1940 colder and the years following 1970 warmer. How convenient. Adding insult to injury, while adjusting the older data, he overwrites and destroys the original records! Please don’t let people like this, who should be considered criminals, take away your freedom.

Carbon Trap

Our power-hungry, money-grubbing politicians are licking their lips in anticipation of enacting legislation to bring about ostensible reductions in CO2. Although they know their actions will exert absolutely no effect upon climate or temperature, they eagerly recognize these actions will establish a process of global governance regulating our energy, economic, and political systems. Before we meekly acquiesce to the end of the American Experiment nullifying the industrial age, let’s give consideration to a few facts.

First, the rapidly growing evidence of real science indicates that the proponents of human-caused global warming are charlatans. No warming has occurred during the past decade and a cooling period is at hand despite the continuing linear increase in CO2. The fakers promoting this fraud are desperately working to change the lexicon from global warming to climate change so that any form of extreme weather can be claimed in support of their groundless theories. Next, the incessant claim of overwhelming consensus among scientists is a blatant lie. Thirdly, the policies being championed belie their deceptive motivations.

The Oregon Institute of Science and Medicine has just released an updated version of their petition containing the names of over 31,000 scientists (over 9,000 of whom are PHDs) stating “There is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane or other greenhouse gases is causing, or will cause in the future, catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate…” Contrary to what the liars will claim, each signatory of this petition has been vetted for authenticity of credentials and purpose. In OISM’s previous survey decried by these liars, the only signature proven to be a fake was one fraudulently submitted by Greenpeace who then tried to use it as an example that the petition was flawed. These Marxists will stop at nothing to destroy our country.

These liars want a carbon cap and trading system imposed rather than a carbon tax, although both are based on an invalid premise. They want the trading scheme because the resulting “tax” will be hidden and will not be seen as a tax. They want our ire directed against the energy companies and not government’s devious policies. A carbon tax at least holds everyone directly accountable for the release of carbon, and everyone could decide for themselves if the true facts justified the imposition of the tax.